The Norwegian conservative government published a proposed state budget plan for 2019. The key tax proposals include a reduction in the corporate income tax rate to 22% and amendments to interest deduction limitation rules.
The 2019 budget includes the following proposals related to corporate taxation in Norway:
The Ministry of Finance proposes that the earnings striping rules be extended to include interest on loans from unrelated parties, but only for companies that are part of a consolidated group. The reason for the proposal is the desire to prevent multinational entities from shifting profits out of Norway by way of financial transactions.
The proposal implies that the tax deductibility of interest costs—interest paid to both to related and unrelated parties—would be limited for Norwegian group companies that have net interest costs exceeding NOK 25 million. If the threshold is exceeded, deductions for net interest cost above 25% of tax EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) would be limited. Denied interest costs could then be carried forward for up to 10 years on a first-in first-out basis.
The rules would primarily be applicable when the group prepares consolidated financial statements that include the company in question. However, the rules would also apply for companies that could be included in the consolidated financial statements under IFRS. This implies that complex assessments required under IFRS would become part of Norwegian tax law.
An exception would apply to the proposed earnings stripping rules if the equity ratio is equal to or greater than the group ratio. The exception would apply to companies that are included in a consolidated financial statement prepared under NGAAP, Japanese GAAP, U.S. GAAP, IFRS or the accounting rules in another EEA Member State.
The starting point for the assessment of the equity ratio would be the consolidated financial statement(s) and the accounts of the company.
Taxpayers could fully deduct interest costs if able to document that the equity ratio of the company is not lower than the equity ratio reported in the consolidated financial statement. Alternatively, this calculation could be made collectively for all Norwegian group companies. Under such circumstances, the Ministry of Finance would assume that no profit shifting has taken place.
Based on the language of the proposal, the equity ratio must correspond to or be greater than that of the group. "Correspond to" means that it must be equal to, but a deviation of 2% would be acceptable.
If a company claims full deductions based on the exception as a single company, the financial statements of that company would have to be revised and would have to be based on the same accounting principles as those of the consolidated financial statements. The proposal includes certain adjustments that would have to be made to the accounts—both at the company level and at the consolidated level to determine that the equity ratio is comparable.
The consolidated balance sheet would have to be prepared under the accounting principles that apply for the consolidated financial statements. The discussion draft proposes several adjustments that would apply for the consolidation (for example income increases and deductions for goodwill).
Note that interest on debt to related parties that are not part of the consolidated group, both companies and individuals, could be denied if net interest costs exceed 25% of tax EBITDA. A threshold of NOK 5 million per company applies.
Under the proposal, claiming deductions under the exception could result in comprehensive filing and documentation obligations.
All relevant amounts would have to be stated in a separate form to be filed as an attachment to the tax returns. The attachment would detail all necessary adjustments made in the accounts and would need to be signed by an auditor.
Under the current rules, unused interest deductions that are carried forward cannot be used—even if the total amount of the net current year interest costs and the carryforward is below the threshold amount. The Ministry of Finance proposes to repeal this limitation.
If passed by Parliament in December 2018, the rules would be effective as of 1 January 2019, and the assessment of the equity ratio would be assesses on the prior year financial statements (i.e., 31 December 2018 for FY 2019).
Under the proposed amendment to the tax residency rules, a company incorporated under the laws of Norway would be regarded as tax resident in Norway, unless considered as tax resident in another country under a tax treaty.
A foreign company with its place of effective management in Norway would under the proposal be regarded as tax resident in Norway. The proposal aligns the interpretation of the term” place of effective management” with the OECD definition, providing that the place of the day-to-day management is increasingly important. For foreign companies, an overall assessment would be necessary, and the assessment would place less emphasis on the place of executive management at the board level. While the most relevant factors are management at board level and daily management, other factors such as key management and commercial decisions necessary for conducting the entity’s business, may also be relevant.
In December 2014, the “Scheel committee” recommended that Norway to introduce withholding tax on interest and royalties, (including lease payments such as, for instance, with respect to bareboat charters) with a proposed rate of 15%.
In the budget 2019 proposal, the Ministry of Finance stated that there currently is work being done on a proposal to introduce domestic legal authority for withholding tax on interest and royalty payments—with a public hearing planned within 2018 and with a goal to propose new rules in 2019. Contrary to 2014 report, the budget 2019 does not explicitly include lease payments.
Indications are that if introduced, withholding tax would be applied as EU/EEA law allows (probably net taxation basis). Note, however, existing tax treaties limit withholding tax on interest and royalties, including the treaties with the other Nordic countries, Luxembourg, and the UK.
Read about proposals in the budget 2019 for the petroleum industry in TaxNewsFlash
For more information, contact a tax professional with the KPMG member firm in Norway:
Per Daniel Nyberg | +47 4063 92 65 | email@example.com
Thor Leegaard | +47 4063 91 83 | Thor.Leegaard@kpmg.no
Pål-Martin Schreiner | +47 4063 45 26 | Pal.Schreiner@kpmg.no
Marius Aanstad | +47 4063 95 51 | Marius.Aanstad@kpmg.no
© 2020 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.