close
Share with your friends

Netherlands: Dutch Supreme Court follows CJEU in “per element” approach

Netherlands: Dutch Supreme Court “per element” approach

The Supreme Court of the Netherlands (Hoge Raad) rendered a final judgment in two corporate income tax cases (for which it had previously requested and in early 2018 received a preliminary ruling from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)).

1000

Related content

The common issue in both cases is: whether taxpayers, despite being unable to enter into a fiscal unity with subsidiaries established elsewhere in the EU, are nevertheless eligible for benefits from separate elements of the fiscal unity regime as if a fiscal unity with foreign subsidiaries can be entered into—the “per element” approach.

  • One case concerned an interest deduction limitation (profit shifting, under section 10a of the Dutch corporate tax law). The Supreme Court held that, in accordance with the CJEU judgment, this measure was contrary to the freedom of establishment. A bill with “emergency repair” measures was submitted in early June 2018, in response to the CJEU judgment, and these measures would mean that some corporate income tax and dividend withholding tax rules, even in domestic relationships, would have to be applied as if there were no fiscal unity. 
  • The other case involves the deduction of foreign exchange losses on EU participations. The Supreme Court followed the CJEU and held there is no violation of EU law. 

 

Read an October 2018 report prepared by the KPMG member firm in the Netherlands

© 2019 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.

Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.

The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.

Connect with us

 

Want to do business with KPMG?

 

loading image Request for proposal