The Delhi Bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal found that application of an arm’s length price adjustment to the taxpayer’s intra-group services would lead to the corresponding reduction in the taxpayer’s revenue, and thus deleted a transfer pricing adjustment in respect of the intra-group services.
The case is: Mercer Consulting India Pvt Ltd. v. DCIT (ITA No. 1085/Del/2016)
The taxpayer, a “captive” information technology enabled services provider, followed a transfer pricing policy of marking up its operating expenses by a margin of 20% for invoiced services provided its foreign related parties.
The tax authorities asserted that a 20% mark-up was less than the arm’s length standard. Instead, the Transfer Pricing Office found that a mark-up of 29.53% was determined to be at arm’s length. Also, a second adjustment was made concerning the cost of the intra-group services that the taxpayer received from its foreign related parties. This cost was found to be “nil.”
The Dispute Resolution Panel restored the 20% mark-up as being at arm’s length, but did not reverse the adjustment relating to the cost of intra-group services.
The taxpayer sought judicial review by the tribunal, which issued a taxpayer-favorable decision rejecting the position of the tax authorities with respect to the cost of intra-group services.
Read a September 2016 report [PDF 335 KB] prepared by the KPMG member firm in India: Arm’s length principle cannot be invoked when replacement of self-declared prices of international transactions by arm’s length price results in lowering of taxpayer’s income chargeable to tax
© 2020 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved.
Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.
The KPMG logo and name are trademarks of KPMG International. KPMG International is a Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent member firms. KPMG International provides no audit or other client services. Such services are provided solely by member firms in their respective geographic areas. KPMG International and its member firms are legally distinct and separate entities. They are not and nothing contained herein shall be construed to place these entities in the relationship of parents, subsidiaries, agents, partners, or joint venturers. No member firm has any authority (actual, apparent, implied or otherwise) to obligate or bind KPMG International or any member firm in any manner whatsoever. The information contained in herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. For more information, contact KPMG's Federal Tax Legislative and Regulatory Services Group at: + 1 202 533 4366, 1801 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006.