General Counsels, legal teams and legal operations executives are in an increasingly demanding and complex environment. The business of law is undergoing a seismic shift from being predominantly reactive and transactional to becoming more proactive, strategic and advisory in nature.
There is a large body of published expert opinion providing advice on how to manage your external expenditure in relation to the procurement of external counsel (billing guidelines, alternative fee arrangements, panel structures etc.), but less opinion and advice when it comes to applying the spend management lens on your internal legal operations. This article seeks to provide some opinion and provoke thought in this specialist area.
Previous models for budgeting legal spend are being tested by an increasingly unpredictable compliance, regulation and governance based business environment combined with increasing demand of business teams for their in-house legal teams to be involved earlier in projects and with a more proactive mandate. The traditional model of law panel firms, billing guidelines and centralised budgets held by the GC is rapidly becoming obsolete as the C-Suite demand more accurate forecasting of spend, evidence of efficiency in the procurement and delivery of legal services and value based outcomes. The question being most wrestled with is, ‘how can we do more with a similar or a shrinking budget’ while workloads increase and the role of in-house legal teams are changing?
The latest General Counsel Roundtable & Plexus Thought Leaders research (PDF 11.4MB) identified that “75 percent of CEO’s believe their legal functions do not deliver sufficient value to justify the time and money spent”. This is a significant figure and encompasses many challenges but also provides opportunities for forward thinking GC’s to deliver visible and tangible change. There is an industry wide call to action to ‘do better’. But where do you start?
When considering any kind of change or transformation of your legal spend management model there is a tendency just to jump straight into implementing a technology-based solution as evidence of immediate action and decisiveness. A key question to start with is ‘how do we bridge the widening ‘value’ gap between our current legal operating model and increasing expectations of the organisation?’. This widens the discussion to include more than just budgets and incorporates a focus on purpose, skills, resourcing, processes, technology, value and stakeholder expectations and requirements.
Six key factors to address include:
As quoted at the General Counsel Roundtable & Plexus Thought Leaders research (PDF 11.4MB), “the average lawyer spends 25-40 percent of their time on activities that don’t require a lawyer”. If your legal team could get this time back would you still have resource or budget issues, and more importantly would your C-Suite perceptions of legal change?
Most In-house teams understand that a combination of technology and new legal delivery services will support them achieve their goal of delivering on ‘more for less’, but with so many combinations available, who do you listen to, where do you start, what’s involved and more importantly what approach has a proven success rate?
“Analysis of legal spend patterns against different ratios of internal and external allocation has identified an optimal range where legal spend was most efficient – between 40-70 percent allocated internally” – 2018 State of Corporate Legal Departments (PDF 3.54MB). This offers huge opportunity for proactive GC’s and supporting internal departments (i.e. IT, Procurement, Risk) to explore, test and discover the optimal legal operating model to deliver legal services for their organisation.
There are two common approaches when considering the optimal legal operating model:
Following on from the ‘key question’ to ask when using the previous traditional model outlined above, we now need to ask a second question to enable our transition to the proactive model approach: "How can we make our legal services scalable for the organisation’s current and future needs?". This broadens our discussion point to include work activity tracking, automation, work flow, on demand resources, managed services and specialist technology and applications.
The current landscape for proactive legal service delivery is complex, and many new solutions are unable to demonstrate Return on Investment (ROI), longevity, or be implemented by the legal team alone, especially when technology solutions form part of the new legal operating model.
GC’s can quickly find themselves entering an unfamiliar world of being a Transformation Sponsor in the context of cross departmental decision making (and in some cases ownership), multiple business stakeholders and project teams, business case development, cost and ROI analysis, shared budgets and special requests for project funding (or up to 12 month delays until the new budget cycle). The energy required to make even small changes can initially appear to be time consuming and overwhelming.
Common barriers check list:
The KPMG Legal Operations and Transformation Services (LOTS) team, which includes experienced legal operations professionals; process engineers; lawyers; former general counsels; legal technologists; procurement specialists and legal project managers can assist you in successfully navigating this landscape by utilising KPMG’s Legal Transformation Framework, Legal Diagnostic Tool and Legal Business Case Planner.
We help you to overcome internal barriers and cut through the ‘white noise’ and focus on the core combination of people, process and technology solutions. We provide a unique approach where, our advice is based on your specific strategic goals, your organisations culture and bespoke data analysis. We ‘simplify the complexity’ for you by utilising advanced scenario modelling and relevant industry examples to demonstrate successful design and implementation of new legal delivery models with proven strategic business impacts. You can feel confident you have the best evidence in which to base your decision and deliver the most impact for your organisation.
The future of legal spend management and the subsequent models that may be applicable are the subject of much debate and discussion. There is a general consensus that some current trends will continue, which can help with the definition of future modelling, defining future skills requirements and considering the likely ground work needed for new technology based solutions and services. The KPMG Legal Operations & Transformation team have consolidated our thoughts and developed the ‘Predicted Future Model for Legal Spend Management’.
When considering your future spend management model the ‘key question’ to ask yourself can vary as it is based on predictors not certainty, GC thought leaders are already considering ‘what will the continued pace of innovation in the industry mean for the future of legal services delivery and what will be the impact?’.
The following current trends are likely to continue:
Based on the predicted future model, new emerging trends are as follows:
The future is bright and no matter the level of maturity you have achieved in your spend management journey, it usually comes back to one core question: "Is legal perceived as a cost centre or is it a key contributor to the current and future value and success of the business?’" And if not, how do we get there? By taking the first step.
©2021 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.
For more detail about the structure of the KPMG global organisation please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.