{{vm.title}}
25{{vm.includesText}}
{{item}}
{{vm.selectText}}
{{ vm.welcomeLabel.trim() }},
{{ vm.userName }}
{{ vm.text }}
{{vm.newUser1}} {{vm.newUser2}} {{vm.newUser3}} {{vm.newUser4}}
{{ vm.unknownUser }}
{{ vm.title }}
{{ vm.title }}
{{ vm.title }}
- {{ vm.siteSelectorList.flyout.cell1.heading }} {{ site.countryLocale }} {{ vm.siteSelectorList.flyout.cell1.global.countryLocale }}
{{ vm.closeTabLabel }}
- {{ vm.flyout.cell2.title }} {{ vm.flyout.cell2.newTabAllow }} {{ vm.flyout.cell2.title }}
- {{ vm.flyout.cell3.title }} {{ vm.flyout.cell3.newTabAllow }} {{ vm.flyout.cell3.title }}
- {{ vm.flyout.cell1.viewAll.label }} {{ vm.flyout.cell1.viewAll.newTabAllow }} {{ vm.flyout.cell1.viewAll.label }}
ATO guidance on restructuring
ATO guidance on restructuring
KPMG’s Peter Madden, Fabian Fedele and Hanah Lewis discuss Practical Compliance Guideline: Part IVA of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 and restructures of hybrid mismatch arrangements.
The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) has recently finalised Practical Compliance Guideline: Part IVA of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 and restructures of hybrid mismatch arrangements (“PCG 2018/7”).
The finalised guidance offers assistance to taxpayers who restructure out of hybrid arrangements, by broadly examining instances where an effort to redress a hybrid arrangement may result in the application of the anti-avoidance principle under Part IVA. In determining whether a restructure in this context will result in the application of Part IVA, PCG 2018/7 distinguishes between restructures that may be considered low or high risk.
To continue reading this article, please log in or register for KPMG Tax Now.
