These two functions often get confused or combined, but defining them clearly is essential to minimise financial risks, unnecessary costs, and to seize opportunities to add greater value to the business.
If we use the analogy of a restaurant, we could say that Information Technology Asset Management (ITAM) is the kitchen (back of house), while Information Technology Service Management (ITSM) is the dining area, (front of house).
While both must work synchronously to deliver an excellent dining experience, they are under separate management with different teams, tools and processes. It is clear who does what, while having clearly established interfaces.
This same level of distinction and multi-focus is not often seen between ITAM and ITSM. ITAM is usually confused as being part of ITSM, which can be a missed opportunity for the organisation overall.
At the root of the confusion is a common assumption that asset management is the same as configuration management, which is a central process of ITSM. This happens because ‘asset’ and ‘configuration item’ (CI) are often interchangeable and, therefore, ITAM is done as part of ITSM.
In fact, an asset (and ITAM) has two key differences to a CI (and ITSM):
ITSM is almost always under time-pressure to complete its tasks, as the tasks often have a direct immediate impact on the business. ITAM tasks can often be deferred without direct impact (unless there is a contractual deadline).
In addition, most organisations tend to use a Configuration Management Database (CMDB) as the ITAM tool, and over-populate it with asset data, leading to the confusion that assets and CIs are the same.
However, storing both in a CMDB can lead to a failure to meet the objectives of both functions. ITSM wants a limited set of quality data on the configuration of the essential assets for it to deliver its services. In contrast, ITAM wants a comprehensive inventory system to store every asset and their associated attributes that need management.
Having clearly defined functions is necessary because it means each function is better placed to offer deeper insights and value to the business.
In fact, as the task of effectively managing assets becomes more complex, developing ITAM as a separate function is increasingly necessary. In our experience, confusing the two functions has led to the following five common consequences:
Of course, like the restaurant example, the two functions must also be aligned and have clearly defined interfaces to ensure they are working in harmony. This is where organisations that invest in having an ITSM and ITAM operating model defined and implemented will find they are reaching the outcomes they have set out to achieve.
At KPMG we offer organisations support with ITAM/SAM and ITSM. We see them as separate but complementary services that work in alignment to service the business overall.
Our advisory services focus on helping organisations establish an effective ITAM/SAM or ITSM operating model that is aligned to the organisation’s business objectives, and uplifts capabilities so that teams can be self-sufficient.
Alternatively, we also offer a managed service for SAM – Software Asset Management as-a-Service (SAMaaS) – for organisations which just want SAM risks and opportunities managed.
With our SAMaaS, we set up a baseline of data on an organisation’s software licenses and usage, and provide ongoing oversight. We look for risks and help with risk mitigation strategies. Drawing on the data, we can assist with cost optimisation around licences, or to seize opportunities for improvement. We can also help SAM functions to embrace the data to offer much more strategic insights to the broader business.
A key starting point is to look at the overall IT operating model, and to separate ITAM/SAM from ITSM, so each function can focus on what it does best, while supporting each other, and the organisation.
You can learn about setting up a strategy for a SAM operating model, in The power of a Software Asset Management operating model.
©2021 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. The KPMG name and logo are trademarks used under license by the independent member firms of the KPMG global organisation.
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.
For more detail about the structure of the KPMG global organisation please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.