Grant Wardell-Johnson explains the major changes and choices made by 11 signatory countries in the Asia-Pacific region.
For those with international structures the signing of the Multilateral Instrument (MLI) on 7 June 2017 in Paris presents a new phase in thinking about treaties. There were 67 signatories including all major economies with the exception of the United States and Brazil.
These included 11 countries in our region, 7 in the Americas and 27 of the 28 EU Countries. More have expressed and intention to sign up in the coming months.
There are more than 1,100 treaties that have changed, with about 360 treaties changed in our region.
The detail of the changes and likely timing are complex.
One thing is clear: all signatories have agreed to the Principal Purpose Test. This will give rise to a new focus on equity and debt chains both by multinational corporations and various funds, but also by revenue authorities.
The KPMG publication ASPAC and the Multilateral Instrument (PDF 2.6MB) outlines the major changes and the choices made by 11 countries in the Asia-Pacific Region.
I hope it will be useful in helping to frame a plan of action in relation to the MLI, especially with the concluding section on ‘What is to be done?’
As two leadership thinkers, Jamal & Tracy, once wrote “awareness is the starting point of every quest, and the outcome of every journey”. I hope this document is helpful on the MLI.
© 2020 KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International"), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.
KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”) is a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis-à-vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm.